June 19, 2024


Simply Consistent

Amber Heard suggests jurors were influenced by pro-Johnny Depp posts on social media: ‘How could they not?’

Amber Heard

Amber Read testifying in the course of her trial in opposition to her ex, Johnny Depp, at the Fairfax County Circuit Courthouse in Virginia.Brendan Smialowski/Pool by way of REUTERS

  • Amber Heard prompt the pro-Johnny Depp social-media posts influenced the jury throughout their trial.

  • She reported the content material was everywhere you go and that “it would have been not possible to steer clear of” for the jury.

  • Depp followers dominated most of the online notice the demo gained. Jurors in the long run awarded Depp additional in damages.

Amber Listened to advised that the jury in her higher-profile defamation demo towards her ex, Johnny Depp, were motivated by the significant amount of money of social-media posts in support of Depp.

NBC’s “Today” show aired a portion of Heard’s job interview with Savannah Guthrie on Tuesday. More of it is airing on Wednesday, and in an hour-prolonged distinctive on Friday.

In it, Heard claimed jurors would not have been ready to prevent the professional-Depp articles during the demo, saying that “the huge bulk of this demo was played out on social media.”

“The jury is not immune to that,” she stated.

Guthrie then requested Read if she assumed the jury observed that articles on social media.

Listened to responded: “How could they not?”

“I imagine even the most nicely-intentioned juror — it would have been difficult to prevent this.”

Depp sued Listened to for defamation around a Washington Article op-ed that claimed she was a sufferer of domestic abuse. The article experienced not named Depp. Read then counter-sued Depp, also accusing him and his authorized crew of defamation.

The defamation trial lasted for 6 months, with the jury discovering on June 1 the two Depp and Read liable for defamation but awarding Depp extra in damages. Jurors sided with Depp on all three of his defamation issues, awarded Heard just one of her three counterclaims.

Heard’s attorney, Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, formerly informed “Today” that she thought social media experienced “certainly” motivated the jury.

“You can find no way they couldn’t have been affected by it,” she explained. “And it was terrible. It was actually, actually lopsided.”

Listened to also said the way she was handled on social media was not “fair.”

“Even any person who is absolutely sure I’m deserving of all this detest and vitriol, even if you believe that I am lying, you even now couldn’t tell me — search me in the eye and tell me — that you think on social media there is been a honest illustration,” she advised “Today.”

Read and Depp’s trial, all of which was livestreamed, attracted big amounts of on-line attention.

As Insider’s Lindsay Dodgson and Charissa Cheong beforehand noted, Depp admirers designed up a the vast majority of those posting on the web, flooding platforms with information that backed Depp and branded Read as a liar.

Study the unique short article on Insider